Geir Arne Brevik, February 21 2006:

RSS addicition and relevance vs. frequency

My name is Geir Arne, and I’m an RSS addict. I currently subscribe to 65 feeds, but have been close to 110 news sources in bad periods. Needless to say, that generates a lot of news to read, and I don’t know what’s the biggest problem; the time I use to scan through all the articles I’m not interested in, or all the excellent articles I actually end up reading.

As I’ve tried to deal with my addiction, I’ve become more and more specific about the feeds I subscribe to. I’ll try to analyze what kinds of feeds I subscribe to, and if there is a pattern to when I keep a feed, and when I choose to unsubscribe.

What do I subscribe to?

What don’t I subscribe to?

What does this mean?

There are two notions in the world of blogging: update your site often, or no-one will visit you, and write something good, and visitors will come to you. There are still some truth to both, but I think the key is in the balance between quantity and quality.

Consider this: A good, but not excellent, site that updates eight times a day, can be seen as annoying and be deleted, while another site with the same average quality that updates once a week could be kept. Or to be more specific: If you update your feed often, you’d better keep it good. After all, the problem with RSS-addicion lies in the number of new items, not number of feeds as such.

How important is this?

Right now? Not very important, as I’m not your average web user. But if RSS goes mainstream with Internet Explorer 7, and the increasing popularity of Firefox, it could start to mean something in this sea of information overflow. For now, it’s only something to consider if you want have geeks like me visiting your website.